My condition has to be given by the court after the Panama Supreme Court case last remarks. The court said it will implement Article 62 and only 63 survived Haq all members in parliament. The constitution does not meet one of the 342 members of the two articles Pakistan.
I think this is the end of it which Article of the Constitution, which will meet the representatives of the parliament has become so difficult? Let's try to learn about it.
According to Article 62 that only that person can become part of the council or parliament,
Be of good character and be known as the deviation from the rules.
Under the same Article (e) he has adequate knowledge of Islamic teachings and practices obligatory duties of Islam leader, and helps avoid major sins
The clause (vi) According to mature, be pious, honest and trustworthy and is not contrary to any court.
But alas Panama case members overseas assets are witnesses of this Parliament how to descend the article.
Article 63 Members of Parliament describes the disqualification, any person will be disqualified from the National Assembly,
(A) they have been the wit and the like by a competent court. (This can readers make better decisions).
According to the article sub-clause (b) The non-winning acquittal bankruptcy. (Who can be a much truer members holding key positions who run the country's business and a person assigned to the task and how this ability and training).
You will get the same Article (c) significant to note that the MLAs if not a citizen of Pakistan or citizenship of a foreign state to be unfit.
Members of the majority of parliament seats, sub-clause (a) has been deviated according to which man must follow advertise such determination by a court of competent when unfit assembly or in any manner that the ideology of Pakistan, sovereignty , integrity or security or morality or injurious to public peace or integrity or independence of Pakistan's judiciary, the armed forces or the judiciary or which defames or Pakistan because of its shame. (Take look up the statements made in this respect, politicians, the media, if these statements in the light of the action to be half the parliament will be empty).
Here are sub-clause (s) to which the MP would be disqualified if it took more than two million rupee Rs 20 lakh loan. From a bank, financial institution, cooperative society or cooperative body, it took the name of his wife, the husband, and then the payment was not possible a year, or loans were made forgiven a. (But, Panama case, you do not pay for the forgiveness of loans from banks or credit here politics mood).
If members mused after the remarks we made automatically by selecting your votes are sent to Parliament, the slogans, give money, give time, campaigning, resources that we have already provide the Parliament in order to solve our problems. But the question I have thought about that before the scarce resources that we have representatives of the character? We have to eat the prison who are proud of the leader, the leader is considered the model of us who earn money by investing abroad, they have debt that representative is considered the most civilized area a rogue, his wealth is called a monster covered its flaws. On the other hand, relatively serious, patriotic, honest and fail we look at a person belonging to the middle class, only the ground that he is the one who wins? Why should we not be wasting their votes if the member assembly. Our thinking on the remarks made by the court today.
Remarks Remarks This is not a case to be made, but a reflection of our collective thinking. Siraj is also part of the Parliament, it was no creature came down from heaven, nor any single person. Not hundreds of millions of people in the country, but they do not reach the corridors of power simply because we do not want to hurt them. That's why we need to change our collective approach. The destiny of the nation, but politicians do not we change ourselves. The right to vote, through their own resources and slogans, are the chosen representatives who meet the Article 62 and 63.
Change for change from windows closed cemetery society, and people hoping to shine lights the darkness of my frustrations to bring prosperity to the country and forehead. The bright lights change their hearts, rose up from the homeland prosperity.
کوئی تبصرے نہیں:
ایک تبصرہ شائع کریں